Cambridge Designers: F. Frederick Bruck & Phoebe Mason Bruck

F. Frederick Bruck

Ferdinand Friedrich (Frederick) Adrian Bruck was born on January 24, 1921, in Breslau, Germany (present-day Wroclaw, Poland) the son of Eberhard Ferdinand Bruck and Irmgard Jentzsch Bruck. At the age of 15, Ferdinand left Germany for England and enrolled at the Bootham School in York, England. As they had means to do so, Bruck’s family fled Germany due to the growing antisemitic ideology seen there. Ferdinand Bruck was listed as “Hebrew” in his immigration documents, and his father fled Germany as a “refugee scholar”, the latter finding work elsewhere in Europe and eventually landing in the United States accepting a teaching position at Harvard.

Bruck in his Harvard Freshman Yearbook, 1937.

In 1937, Ferdinand Bruck arrived in Cambridge to attend Harvard University, his freshman dorm room was in Matthews Hall in Harvard Yard. His education was interrupted by World War II when he was drafted. Before leaving for the War, he and his girlfriend attended the Cocoanut Grove Nightclub in Boston, the night where the infamous fire occurred, which claimed the lives of 490 people. Bruck helped people escape from the blaze. He was hospitalized as a result of the fire and ensuing panic, and his departure for war was delayed. From the hospital, Bruck applied to the Harvard Graduate School of Design (GSD) and was accepted.

Aftermath of Cocoanut Grove fire, Boston, November 1942. Boston Public Library collections.

He attended GSD during the spring and summer of 1942 but had to leave soon after for the war. He served in the US Army’s Military Intelligence Service unit back in his home country of Germany. Mr. Bruck spent the end of 1942-1945 overseas. He became a naturalized citizen of the United States in 1943 while serving.

Draft registration card for Ferdinand Friedrich Adrian Bruck. Ancestry.com

After the war, Mr. Bruck completed his time at GSD, where he learned Modernist design under Walter Gropius, a fellow German architect. During the summers, he apprenticed at the engineering firm of Stone & Webster, a major electrical engineering firm, designing power plants, dams, and other such structures along with the other estimated 800 fellow draughtsman at the company. Bruck would state in a later interview that it was not a good experience, but he learned something.

Ferdinand F. Bruck’s senior picture in Harvard yearbook.

After graduating from Harvard GSD, Bruck taught at the school part-time as an Associate Professor, a position he held from 1952-1963. Concurrently, he was hired by The Architects Collaborative under former professor Walter Gropius and assisted on designs with the firm as well as accepting independent commissions under his company, F. Frederick Bruck, Architect and Associates.

After his time at Harvard, Bruck was awarded the coveted Wheelwright Traveling Fellowship in 1954 and had the opportunity to travel the world, studying Modern architecture. Upon his return to the United States, Mr. Bruck married Phoebe Ann Mason (more on her later) and the couple purchased and moved into a new home at 77 Walker Street in Cambridge, a modest Queen Anne Victorian house built in 1885. Bruck’s Modernist sensibilities were toned down for his personal updates to his residence with a simple one-story porch and entry, new windows at the sides and rear, and a renovated interior. The exterior was largely maintained which likely made the neighbors happy at the time!

77 Walker Street, the home to Fred and Phoebe Bruck until the 1970s.

In 1959, Bruck received possibly his first commission in Cambridge by Peter Knapp, a psychiatrist at 77 Raymond Street, who sought an addition where he could hold meetings with clients. The house which was sited at the rear of the lot was reconstructed from an existing stable in 1938 on its existing site in the Colonial Revival style. F. Frederick Bruck envisioned an elongated Miesian-style one-story wing which would project off the side of the 1938 home. The glass addition and solid fence would create a private, inner courtyard which was landscaped to provide a feeling of solace and serenity to his patients when they visited the home. A meandering path was added to connect the driveway and detached garage to the house at the rear of the lot. Bruck was also commissioned to construct a new addition at the rear of the existing garage for Knapp’s wife’s art studio and storage space. The overall composition is not visible from the street.

 

Drawing by F. Frederick Bruck of “Knapp House Addition”, (1960) 77 Raymond Street. Cambridge ISD Plans.

Fred Bruck’s first major new construction project in Cambridge is a project that almost never was. When renovating a 1922 house on Gray Gardens East, the owners were heartbroken to learn a fire reduced their home down to the foundation. The owners, Harvard Professor I. Bernard Cohen and Frances Davis Cohen retained Bruck in 1962 to design them a new house. In rebuilding, Fred Bruck used the same foundation from the original house, but more vertical in a townhouse form. A requirement by the owners was for large expanses of side walls without windows to give the Cohens the space they needed for paintings and Professor Cohen’s large library, which was located on the top floor overlooking mature trees. A special design feature of the house in the front hall with its arched entrance, a nod to the Federal Revival fan light transoms, and on the inside, an 18-foot-high ceiling. The façade is dominated by an exterior chimney, further accentuating the verticality of the design.

22 Gray Gardens East, CHC Staff photograph.

About the same time Bruck designed the Cohen House, he was engaged in one of the largest design competitions in the country, the Boston City Hall competition. In October 1961, Mayor John Collins announced that the City of Boston would select the design for its new City Hall through an open, nationwide design competition. By the deadline, over 200 submissions were received, and eight finalists were selected, including one from the team of F. Frederick Bruck and Ervin Y. Galantay (a visiting architecture professor at Harvard GSD at the time). The duo’s design was a large, square building elevated on columns, with an expansive plaza surrounding. The building was on an elevated plaza which was connected to the larger open space by a bridge leading to a circular reflecting pool. The design was ultimately not chosen by the panel, who instead selected the design by the young team of Kallmann McKinnell & Knowles.

Proposed architectural model for Boston City Hall designed by “F Frederick Bruck and Ervin Y Galanty” (1962). Courtesy of Boston City Archives.

Within a year after he lost the design competition for Boston City Hall, Fred Bruck was commissioned by Alan and Claire Steinert to design them a new residence in the Reservoir Hill area of West Cambridge. Alan Steinert of the Steinert Piano family and his wife Claire were in their sixties and when they purchased the former Charles C. Little House on Highland Street, they decided it was too large and dated for their tastes. It was demolished and Fred Bruck was hired to design a one-story Modern house to accommodate the aging couple, their art collection, and allow for social gatherings. The couple insisted on having the latest technologies, including central air-conditioning, radiant heating, and low voltage lighting to highlight their artworks. The design was featured in Architectural Record’s annual Record Houses, highlighting the best residential project designs of the past year. Describing the construction of the house, Frederick Bruck said “the house is wood frame with dark brick veneer. Brick was chosen to blend with the substantial character of the surrounding houses, to reduce maintenance, and because it is a material which could meet the sloping terrain. Wood frame was chosen for economy and to facilitate construction during the winter months.” The building remains one of the best examples of 1960s residential designs in Cambridge.

64 Highland Street, 2016.

F. Frederick Bruck and his wife Phoebe moved from their Walker Street home to Coolidge Hill Road in the mid-1970s, modernizing a 1920s brick Colonial Revival house for their retirement. Other projects by Fred Bruck include the 1966 Bullfinch Office Center (remodeled in the late 1980s in the Post-Modern style by Graham Gund), the 1970 Charlestown Fire Station, and dozens of private residences all over New England. Fred Bruck died on May 14, 1997 and is buried at Mt. Auburn Cemetery in Cambridge.

Phoebe A. Mason Bruck

Phoebe Ann Mason was born in Highland Park, Illinois on November 26, 1928, the daughter of George Allen Mason and Louise Townsend Barnard. After attending Bard College from 1946 to 1949, she studied architecture at the Illinois Institute of Technology’s (IIT) Institute of Design, which was founded as the New Bauhaus. There, Phoebe was introduced to Modern architecture and design, which would impact her taste and career for decades to come. She graduated from IIT in 1954.

Undated photo of Phoebe Ann Mason Bruck, Cambridge Chronicle 2004.

While in Illinois, Phoebe worked as a designer at Baldwin Kingree, a women-owned Modern design store established in 1947 in Chicago. Baldwin Kingree was founded by Kitty Baldwin Weese (wife of Modernist architect Harry Weese) and Jody Kingree. The store specialized in Scandinavian Modern furnishings to fill American homes with affordable, architect-designed furniture and objects. While in Chicago working at Baldwin-Kingree, Phoebe was spotted by Ben Thompson of The Architects Collaborative, who convinced her to move to Cambridge to serve as head of the design department for his new store.

In Cambridge, Phoebe worked as Head of the Design Department at Design Research, Inc., a home furnishing store in an old, mansard-roofed house on Brattle Street. In her capacity as head designer for Design Research, Phoebe worked often with The Architects Collaborative (TAC) and Sert, Jackson Associates Inc., on many of their projects providing designs and furnishings for interior spaces. While working with Design Research and TAC, Phoebe met F. Frederick Bruck, and they married in 1956. Phoebe, like many women in the design profession at the time, likely consulted and worked on dozens of projects where she is not credited, it is unclear as to how many projects Phoebe was involved with during her time at TAC or Sert, Jackson, Associates.

Original Design Research Harvard Square store, c.1968. CHC Collections.
Design Research, Inc. new Cambridge store, 48 Brattle Street, c.1972. UVA: Richard Guy Wilson Architecture Archive.

Early in their marriage, Phoebe earned a master’s degree in Landscape Architecture from Harvard University in 1963, and would join forces professionally with her life partner, Fred Bruck at his firm F. Frederick Bruck Architect and Associates, Inc. At the firm, Phoebe wore many hats consulting on furnishings and interiors for her husband’s projects as well as developing landscape plans and designs complimentary to Mr. Bruck’s Modern designs.

In 1968, Phoebe stumbled upon an advertisement in the Boston Globe, which marketed land in New Hampshire, suitable for a vacation retreat. The ad read, “…Strafford. 48 acres. Mountain top, excellent view. You can see for miles. Small log cabin. Timber cut off.” Phoebe and Fred Bruck travelled up to New Hampshire to find a formerly wooded lot littered with tree stumps, trees lying on top of each other, piles of empty fuel cans and exposed ledges scarred by logging operations. They had already purchased the lot and Phoebe began planning her regeneration of the devastated lot. By 1969, conditions were favorable for burning and much of the site was cleansed with a controlled fire to help restore the soil and forest. Within a year, low bush blueberries, aspen, young maples, birch, and oak trees began to sprout from the charred soil. Fred Bruck converted a former two-room (350 sq. ft.) log cabin into their summer house with decks and a detached out-house for rustic living when visiting their New Hampshire property. Phoebe restored the forest and developed natural gardens scattered throughout the property. The restoration of the forest here was featured in Landscape Architecture Magazine. Phoebe ended the article by writing:

“Ten years after logging, piles of rotting slash still remain in the far corners and along the edges of the property, a vivid reminder of the devastation and seeming destruction which once pervaded the entire site. The green tidal wave of vigorous young pines, birches, oaks and maples, which threatens the engulf the woodlot gives new meaning to the concept of regeneration, for the land as well for its owners.”

Landscape Architecture Magazine: Vol. 69, No. 2 (March 1979).

Phoebe was very busy in Cambridge architecture and landscape circles. She worked as a design critic for the Department of Landscape Architecture at Harvard GSD concurrently with her serving as a judge for the New England Flower Show from 1971-1979. She also served on various boards and committees including the Harvard Square Association, the Harvard Square Advisory Committee, the Quincy Square Design Committee, and served as President of the Boston Society of Landscape Architects (BSLA) from 1973-1975.

Phoebe was a force in her role as President of the Harvard Square Defense Fund and as chair of the Harvard Square Advisory Committee, where she pushed on architects, developers, and the City of Cambridge, advocating for high-quality design that maintained the character of the square. Phoebe was always firm in her positions and was very active in city life in Cambridge until she passed away in 2004. She was buried next to her partner, Fred, on Azalea Path in Mount Auburn Cemetery.

Grave memorial for Fred and Phoebe Bruck. Courtesy of Mt. Auburn Cemetery.

SHOCK WAVES! Part 2

Today, we’re wrapping up our exploration of electricity and its uses, starting with…

Electric Appliances

Cambridge Chronicle November 11, 1916
The Cambridge Tribune January 28, 1888 (excerpt)

Electric appliances were sold by the electric company, not by what we would think of today as an appliance store. Here is what was on offer in 1916 at the Cambridge Electric Light Co.

Cambridge Chronicle December 2, 1916

Electric irons were sold for only $2.00:

Cambridge Tribune June 29, 1907

Electric refrigerators were invented in 1913, but not mass produced until 1918.

“Electrical Notes” Cambridge Sentinel August 1, 1914
Cambridge Tribune March 26, 1921

Electric vacuums: One of our favorite descriptions of an electrical appliance is this one for the “Dirt Annihilator”:

Cambridge Sentinel November 10, 1917

Electric fans and stoves:

Cambridge Chronicle June 24, 1921

Electric washing machine. The first electric washing machine was invented in 1901 by Mr. Alva Fisher. It was not mass produced for several years.

Cambridge Chronicle March 8, 1919
Cambridge Sentinel August 29, 1914

Electric doorbells were invented as early as 1832 by American scientist Joseph Henry, mentioned above, who was later the first Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution. But because the doorbells depended on expensive electric batteries, the product didn’t really take hold until about 1913, when transformers replaced the need for batteries.

Electric clocks were first invented in 1840, relying on a combination of battery and spring pendulum.  A “self-contained battery driven clock,” didn’t hit the market until around 1906.

Let us not forget the 1888 Cambridge baseball team named The Electrics.

Cambridge Chronicle July 28, 1888

Though many aspects of daily life were made easier and safer by electricity, there were still issues. We’re reminded of the expression by Maggie Smith’s Downton Abbey character, the Countess of Grantham, in response to electric illumination: Sometimes I feel as if I were living in an HG Wells novel. But the young are all so calm about change, aren’t they?”

Medical consequences were just one concern on the public’s mind. How about this reference to electricity causing cholera in 1849:

Cambridge Chronicle July 26, 1849

Of course, the medical community lost no time in advertising electrical remedies for whatever ailed you. As early as 1853, Edward C. Rogers was advertising his services as a “Medical Electrician”:

Cambridge Chronicle June 11, 1853

A few decades later, Dr. J. D. Werner bragged that his practice included the “intelligent” use of Medical Electricity.

Cambridge Chronical December 31, 1881

Some of these practices were no doubt precursors to the contemporary and medically-accepted use of electricity to treat mental disorders, such as ECT (electroconvulsive therapy). However, there is something about using Dr. Rhodes’ “Electric Transfusing Battery” to cure everything from rheumatism to flatulence, that seems a little suspicious:

The above ad from the June 26, 1880 edition of The Cambridge Chronicle goes on to list many additional ailments, purported to be cured by his “electrical transfusing battery”, including: Gout, Swollen Joints, Sciatica, Lumbago, Spinal Disease, Wasting, Decay, Restless Nights, Nightmare, Lack of Power of Will, Loss of Confidence, Hysteria, Epilepsy, Heartburn, Dropsy, Asthma, Pleurisy, Jaundice, Seminal weakness, Female Complaints” Oh my!

The interest in the miracle of electricity did not fade during the 20th century. By 1913, the Cambridge Sentinel still saw fit to have a regular column “The Electrical World” (or sometimes “Electrical Notes”) consisting of random reporting about the uses of electricity worldwide. For instance, the world-shattering fact that “seven electric motor trucks will be purchased by the Manila post office.” Wow! Some other snippets from 1913 and 1914 include:  

1913

1914

(Nationally-known market gardener Warren W. Rawson was employing the same electrical technique in his greenhouses in Arlington, Mass)

As we’ve seen above, every new technology spawns new jobs, vocabulary, and idioms. Between 1880 and 1899 inclusively, the word “electric” appeared in the Cambridge Chronicle 5,020 times and in the Cambridge Tribune 3,455 times.

In searching the Cambridge City Directory for jobs self-identified as associated with electricity, we find that in 1880 there was only one electrician listed: William H. Humans, who lived at #11 Rogers Block, on Main Street. The Cambridge Electric Light Co. was located nearby at #23 Main Street. By 1900, there were 140 listed electricians.

The life-changing effect of electricity on private lives is pretty well summed up in this excerpt from a description of soap manufacturer Edward D. Mellon’s new house in 1898:

Cambridge Tribune August 20, 1898
Dining room 1590 Massachusetts Avenue showing electric light fixtures. Curtis Mellen Photograph Collection (CHC).

So…Ever been amped up? Or gone out like a light? Had a “lightbulb” moment? Close your eyes now and just imagine how differently our experience of nighttime would have been before the advent of electricity

We had the sky, up there, all speckled with stars, and we used to lay on our backs and look up at them, and discuss about whether they was made, or only just happened—Jim he allowed they was made, but I allowed they happened; I judged it would have took too long to make so many.”

– Mark Twain

Today’s post was written by CHC volunteer Kathleen Fox.


SOURCES

Building Old Cambridge. Susan E. Maycock and Charles M. Sullivan, 2016 Cambridge Historical Commission; the MIT Press

City of Cambridge Annual Reports

Cambridge Public Library Digitized Newspapers

https://www.britannica.com/technology/clock/Electric-clocks

https://archive.curbed.com/ad/17101030/history-of-the-doorbell-nest-hello

https://www.energy.gov/articles/history-light-bulb

https://www.britannica.com/summary/electricity

https://hollisarchives.lib.harvard.edu/ (for the history of the Cambridge Electric Light Co.)

https://www.nsmedicaldevices.com/analysis/brain-stimulation-therapy-history/embed/#?secret=JF7rXjDbS7

https://lemelson.mit.edu/resources/samuel-morsettps://www.elon.edu/u/imagining/time-capsule/150-years/back-1830-1860/

https://stateimpact.npr.org/pennsylvania/2012/02/24/downton-abbey-and-electricity/

https://archive.curbed.com/ad/17101030/history-of-the-doorbell-nest-hello

https://www.collectorsweekly.com/articles/let-there-be-light-bulbs/embed/#?secret=lXWL13u3Ja

History Cooperative

https://www.britannica.com/technology/clock/Electric-clocks

2023 Preservation Awards: Call for Nominations

Each year, the Cambridge Historical Commission honors projects that have made outstanding contributions to the preservation of the city’s historic character and built environment. The 2022-2023 Preservation Awards will recognize individuals and organizations for projects completed between January and December 2022. The awards will be presented at a ceremony in May 2023.

2022 Preservation Award winner: the 1862 Stephen Stiles house at 2203 Mass Ave (George Pereira and Denise Jillson)

Seven project categories are eligible for Preservation Awards: restoration, rehabilitation, adaptive use, neighborhood conservation, landscape preservation, archaeology, and education. The award-winning projects will be selected based on the following:

  • historical and architectural significance of the preserved property;
  • exceptional quality of the project;
  • extent to which the project contributed to the preservation of the property; and
  • impact of the project on the preservation of the city’s historic resources.

To nominate a project, including your own, please submit a
completed nomination form and supporting documentation
no later than Noon on Friday, February 24, 2023 to:

Cambridge Historical Commission
831 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02139

Or electronically to: histcomm@cambridgema.gov

Note: All submitted materials become the property of the
Cambridge Historical Commission and will not be returned.

For more information on the Cambridge Preservation Awards, or
if you have questions regarding the nomination form, please contact the Commission:
Telephone: 617.349.4683 | Email: histcomm@cambridgema.gov

Members Sought for Three Cambridge Neighborhood Conservation District Commissions

Cambridge City Manager Yi-An Huang is seeking to fill vacancies for members and alternate members the following Cambridge Neighborhood Conservation District (NCD) Commissions: Mid Cambridge, Avon Hill, and Half Crown-Marsh. The deadline for submitting applications is Monday, February 6, 2023. 

23-29 Ware Street in Mid Cambridge

What is a Neighborhood Conservation District?

Neighborhood Conservation Districts were established by city ordinance in 1983. Conservation district designation recognizes a distinctive physical environment that reflects the architectural, cultural, political, economic, or social history of the city. NCDs foster wider public knowledge and appreciation of such neighborhoods. Designation encourages the conservation and maintenance of these areas so that the city may be a more attractive and desirable place in which to live and work.  

Each NCD commission includes five members and three alternates. Most members must reside in the respective district; renters, as well as homeowners, are encouraged to apply. More information and maps of each NCD are available through the following links: 

Mid Cambridge NCDCambridgema.gov/midcambridgencd
Avon Hill NCDCambridgema.gov/avonhillncd
Half Crown-Marsh NCDCambridgema.gov/halfcrownmarshncd

81 Washington Avenue in Avon Hill

Who Should Apply?

Experience in the fields of real estate, architecture, or historic preservation is desirable. Appointments to these Commissions are made by the City Manager, with regard for a diversity of viewpoints and experience.  

What are the Membership/Meeting Expectations?

The volunteer commissions meet monthly and are supported by the professional staff of the Cambridge Historical Commission. Applicants should have an interest in architecture and local history and be committed to conserving and enhancing the characteristic built environment of the neighborhood. The City of Cambridge is committed to advancing a culture of antiracism, diversity, equity, and inclusion. All board and commission members in Cambridge must have the ability to work and interact effectively with individuals and groups with a variety of identities, cultures, backgrounds, and ideologies. Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities are strongly encouraged to apply.

Kenway Street in Half Crown-Marsh

How to Apply?

Individuals interested in being considered should apply through the city’s online application system at Cambridgema.gov/apply and select the respective commission.  A cover letter and résumé or summary of applicable experience can be submitted during the online application process. Paper applications are also available through the City Manager’s Office at Cambridge City Hall, 795 Massachusetts Avenue. The deadline for submitting applications is Monday, February 6, 2023. 

SHOCK WAVES! National Electricity Day

“A bright light is the enemy of rascality”- Cambridge Chronicle July 7, 1883

Cambridge Tribune March 2, 1921

Ever get your wires crossed? Blown a fuse? Received a rousing charge? Blame it on electricity!

In 1869, two out of the four “great events” of the century, ranked by the Cambridge Chronicle in their issue of May 29th, were Morse’s invention of the telegraph in the United States, and the laying of the Atlantic Cable. The other two events were the death of slavery in the U.S. and the completion of the Pacific Railway. Alexander Graham Bell made his first telephone call 1876, and then…

Wow! The Electric Telegraph

Although existing in various experimental forms in Europe in the early 19th century, in the United States it was artist and inventor Samuel F. B. Morse (1791-1821, born in Charlestown, Mass) who made the electric telegraph a reality here. Invented around 1837, it was not until 1843 that Morse received funding from Congress for the first telegraphic line. The cable was strung between Baltimore and Washington, D. C. The first message?  “What god hath wrought.”

The transatlantic telegraph was laid between 1854 and 1858. Written a year before its completion, this awestruck note appeared in the Cambridge Chronicle (September 19, 1857) Excerpt:

By 1869, Cambridge had installed 15 fire alarm boxes using the electric telegraph. The boxes were hooked up to only one bell—that of the Methodist Church in Ward Two at the corner of Third and Cambridge streets. In the Cambridge Annual Report of 1870, it was recommended that henceforth they should be connected to one bell in each ward.

Next Came the Lightbulb Moment

“A boastful Edison catalog cover from 1887” (Courtesy of collectorsweekly.com)

As they did with the telegraph, inventors worldwide were attempting to invent an electric light bulb. In 1835, an electric “arc” bulb was demonstrated in Britain. In the U. S., William Sawyer (1850-1883) and Albon Man (1826-1905) were working together in an attempt to invent the first electric light bulbs here. However, the bulbs continued to burn out too quickly and were not mass produced. It was Thomas Edison (1847-1931) who improved the filament and commercialized the incandescent light bulb, for which he received two patents: in 1879 and 1880.

Cambridge was impatient to join the electrical ranks. On July 9, 1881, The Cambridge Chronicle reported: “There is a movement on foot to introduce electric lights in this city,” implying that things could have been moving more swiftly as they had in other towns. By 1880, Boston was using electric lights. In 1883, William J.  Marvin, Commissioner of the West Boston and Cambridge bridges, did succeed in having both bridges illuminated by electric lights. On July 7, 1883, the Chronicle proclaimed “A bright light is the enemy of rascality. Lighting our streets by electricity would be equal in value to doubling our police force.” 

By 1884, a company “controlled by the American Electric and Illuminating Co.” had been formed to provide electricity to Cambridge, Somerville, Arlington and Watertown. On March 1st of that year, The Cambridge Chronicle noted that:

Excerpt: Cambridge Chronicle March 1, 1884

Still, Cambridge only inched along. Apparently, the Mayor agreed: in 1885, Mayor William E. Russell stated in his annual address:

Cambridge is certainly behind the times in having no such lighting on her streets.

 The expense is much more than lighting by gas; but the improvement is so great that I believe it commends itself to the citizens, and justifies the additional cost. I recommend that, whenever a proper plant is established, the city place electric lights in her squares and on some of her main thoroughfares.

The following year he was able to proclaim “I am very happy to say that arrangements have been made for the use of electric lighting in our main streets and squares.” This included Main and Cambridge Streets, parts of North Avenue from Harvard Square to the Lexington and Arlington Railroad, and Brattle and other squares. This installation would require approximately 70 lights at “55 cents per lamp per night burning all night, or a total cost (estimating for 339 nights per year) of $13,051,50.”  And the other 26 nights…?

Then the Electric Trolley

Spliced car at Arlington Heights (12 May 1898). Source: Frank Cheney.

By 1887, electric trolleys were in use in Kansas City, Cleveland Ohio, Omaha, Nebraska, and Mansfield, Ohio. But not yet in Cambridge.

Referred to as “electrics,” electric trolleys presented a big controversy. Many, many column inches of newspapers were devoted to arguments for or against the trolleys.  Advocates hailed efficiencies in transportation; the opposition was of the NIMBY (Not in My Backyard) variety, complaining about the speed, noise, and the esthetics of overhead wires:

Cambridge Tribune April 7, 1888
Cambridge Tribune August 2,1890
Cambridge Chronicle July 8, 1893

The following year, residents on Brattle Street were stillfighting the case, declaring that “the electric trolley system is a new and improper use of streets.” (Cambridge Tribune September 29, 1894). As an aside, perhaps these citizens forgot to take into account the improved the life of squirrels, who could now scamper from one place to another across the wires instead of the roads, not to mention a newfound site for birds to light and socialize!

Electrical interference with the telephones (in use since 1877) was also a problem, as James W. Lovering, Superintendent of Mount Auburn, complained about in this letter to a client in Boston:

“Dear Sir: We were unable to understand your message by telephone this forenoon.

Since the electric cars began running the interference has been so great that we have been unable to use the telephone with any degree of accuracy, and until the telephone company, to whom we have already made complaint remedy the matter it is absolutely unsafe to attempt to send any message by telephone in regard to anything which is of importance.” (March 12, 1889)

But the West End Railway and electric companies forged ahead. Electric companies allowed the telephone and electric trolley lines to be attached to their poles. These unsightly metal poles were being replaced by “fine sticks of timber” (Annual Report 1891). On May 11, 1893, the Chronicle reported that “it is expected that by June 1 the electric railway system will be complete between Boston and Arlington.”

Electric wires over Central Square on June 7, 1910. Boston Elevated Railway negative, CHC collections.

Yikes! 2,000 Miles of Wires

By 1890, the city was crisscrossed with a combined 2,000 miles of wires—telegraph wires, trolley wires, telephone wires, and private electric wires. It was a dangerous situation: crossed wires started fires, webs of wires prevented firemen from reaching buildings, and trolley wires interfered with telephone reception. As a consequence, in July of 1890, the City established a new position:  Inspector of Wires. The job was to sort out all the technical, legal, and esthetic issues, and to develop rules and regulations for wiring of all sorts. The position was soon filled by the aptly-named Charles H. Morse. Writing on December 29, 1890, Morse reported:

City of Cambridge Annual Report 1890

Soon, the Inspector of Wires’ job description was expanded to include the role of “superintendent of the fire-alarm telegraph, the police signal system and all other electric wires and wire systems.

Stay tuned for the second and final installment where we explore electric appliances, medical electricity and “The Electrical World”!

Today’s post was written by CHC volunteer Kathleen Fox.


SOURCES

Building Old Cambridge. Susan E. Maycock and Charles M. Sullivan, 2016 Cambridge Historical Commission; the MIT Press

City of Cambridge Annual Reports

Cambridge Public Library Digitized Newspapers

https://www.britannica.com/technology/clock/Electric-clocks

https://archive.curbed.com/ad/17101030/history-of-the-doorbell-nest-hello

https://www.energy.gov/articles/history-light-bulb

https://www.britannica.com/summary/electricity

https://hollisarchives.lib.harvard.edu/    (for the history of the Cambridge Electric Light Co.)

https://lemelson.mit.edu/resources/samuel-morsettps://www.elon.edu/u/imagining/time-capsule/150-years/back-1830-1860/

https://stateimpact.npr.org/pennsylvania/2012/02/24/downton-abbey-and-electricity/

https://archive.curbed.com/ad/17101030/history-of-the-doorbell-nest-hello

https://www.britannica.com/technology/clock/Electric-clocks